[Published by Counter Currents]
None of us saw it coming, I am sure, not even the organisers. Despite the calls to join the rally in support of Edward Snowden having taken the social media by a storm, the mood among the organisers was sombre to say the least. It was bound to be; relentless rains had dampened their spirits and made them uncertain of what to expect. Gingerly-written tweets coming with hashtag #SnowdenHK were proof enough of the ambivalence. ‘Lets hope we are not alone!! #liberty for all’ (sic) was what Steve Miller had just tweeted from Chater Garden, the venue where the protest march was scheduled to begin..
And then, it all changed. People started to pour in. The organisers had erred in judging the popular mood in support of Snowden, which had just asserted itself through the huge turnout. Not that they were complaining. This was an error all activists want to make, after all. By making Chater Garden burst at the seams, Hong Kong spoke its heart out for Snowden. Thousands of them had sacrificed a weekend. That’s some sacrifice folks, for it’s only these well deserved breaks on weekends that restore some sanity in our lives bound to run at a maddening pace here in Hong Kong.
Despite not being in the same league, the
turnout was quite reminiscent of protests against the ‘brainwashing’ national
education curriculum proposed by the pro-China system, when more than a hundred
thousand Hong Kongers took to streets in September 2012. The support for
Snowden was in the same league this time around. A survey by the South China
Morning Post, the leading English daily, has found more than half of residents
firmly with Snowden, blowing away any claims to the contrary.
We have no clue where this support comes from.
It might have emanated solely from Hong Kong’s firm belief in the rule of law
and freedom of expression. It could, equally, have come from the guilt associated
with the failure to stop the illegal extradition of Libyan rebel leader Sami
al-Saadi to be tortured by now deposed and dead dictator Muammar Gaddafi’s
regime. One thing was clear though, the people are not going to fail themselves
this time around. Neither are they going to let the government fail them..
Back in Chater Garden, the protest had begun. Albert Ho, the Chairman of HK Alliance and former leader of Democratic Party, took the mike. He reiterated that he joined the protest as the case marks a very important moment in history of Hong Kong, a moment which will put HK’s ‘legal system to the test’. He was joined by Claudia Mo, Legco member (Legco is the abbreviation used for Legislative Council, equivalent of parliament), speaking about the need of protecting whistleblowers and free speech..
The one thing I love most about HK Protests
is their colourfulness. One can hardly see a more colourful and multicultural
protest anywhere in the world. There were native Hong Kongers shouting slogans
in Cantonese and Mainlanders replying (that is if I could make out the language
difference correctly). There were
Americans (citizens) carrying placards, urging their government to stop
hounding dissidents, followed by the South Asian students studying at Hong Kong
University as their t-shirts told us. There were Filipinas and Indonesians
marching with Europeans. Another South Asian face waved at me with a smile and
moved past.
The rally was inching ahead. We had just
crossed the IFC tower and were climbing our way up Cheung Kong Park.
Apparently, people had ignored American Consulate’s ‘advisory’ to avoid areas
near Chater Garden and the American Consulate. Interestingly, Hong Kong police were
keeping a watch on peaceful protesters even more peacefully. That is another
thing I love about Hong Kong and its protests. I don’t know how many of the
expat protesters noticed the empty holsters adorning the uniform of police
personnel deployed for the rally. As a standard operational procedure, HK
authorities take the firearms away from the police officers deployed for
managing such events. Think, now, of the
armed to teeth police contingents that descend on such protests from India to
US.
We had reached the American Consulate, the next
venue for meetings. The rain was back. Umbrellas of a thousand colours were out
again. So were the whistles. Legco member Charles Mak’s speech drew a lot of
applause, all in whistles. It was bound to be as he was speaking on the right
to communicate safely online and freedom of expression. A letter drafted jointly by the 27 civil
society organisations was handed over to Ambassador Steve Young. Not that
anyone expected him, and his government, to act upon it, but he was curtly told
to uphold the human right to a private life guaranteed by the Article 8 of the
UN Declaration.
The rally then convened at Tamar Buildings,
the headquarters of the HKSAR government in Admiralty, and demanded that the
Chief Executive C Y Leung break his silence and protect Snowden and free
speech. Speaker after speaker said what hurts the pro-China lobby in the Legco
the most; CY Leung was urged to uphold the rule of law without interference
from Beijing.
The protest had drawn first blood by the
evening. Leung has finally spoken up and pledged that the government would
“follow up on any incidents related to the privacy or other rights of the institutions
or people in Hong Kong being violated.” He also asserted that the case of Mr.
Snowden, as and when it comes, will be handled “in accordance with the laws and
established procedures of Hong Kong.” That’s some victory, isn’t it?
Comments
Post a Comment